summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/fat/fat_write.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorƁukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>2015-09-03 14:21:39 +0200
committerTom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>2015-09-11 17:15:21 -0400
commit0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe (patch)
treea0bcdc4c76b1415308f18028c26173a9b4f12738 /fs/fat/fat_write.c
parentbcd62e72b2a0185f455ac5bac84416b59b294097 (diff)
downloadu-boot-imx-0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe.zip
u-boot-imx-0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe.tar.gz
u-boot-imx-0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe.tar.bz2
FIX: fat: Provide correct return code from disk_{read|write} to upper layers
It is very common that FAT code is using following pattern: if (disk_{read|write}() < 0) return -1; Up till now the above code was dead, since disk_{read|write) could only return value >= 0. As a result some errors from medium layer (i.e. eMMC/SD) were not caught. The above behavior was caused by block_{read|write|erase} declared at struct block_dev_desc (@part.h). It returns unsigned long, where 0 indicates error and > 0 indicates that medium operation was correct. This patch as error regards 0 returned from block_{read|write|erase} when nr_blocks is grater than zero. Read/Write operation with nr_blocks=0 should return 0 and hence is not considered as an error. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> Test HW: Odroid XU3 - Exynos 5433
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fat/fat_write.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/fat/fat_write.c11
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fat/fat_write.c b/fs/fat/fat_write.c
index 98b88ad..adb6940 100644
--- a/fs/fat/fat_write.c
+++ b/fs/fat/fat_write.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static void uppercase(char *str, int len)
static int total_sector;
static int disk_write(__u32 block, __u32 nr_blocks, void *buf)
{
+ ulong ret;
+
if (!cur_dev || !cur_dev->block_write)
return -1;
@@ -39,8 +41,13 @@ static int disk_write(__u32 block, __u32 nr_blocks, void *buf)
return -1;
}
- return cur_dev->block_write(cur_dev->dev,
- cur_part_info.start + block, nr_blocks, buf);
+ ret = cur_dev->block_write(cur_dev->dev,
+ cur_part_info.start + block,
+ nr_blocks, buf);
+ if (nr_blocks && ret == 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ return ret;
}
/*