diff options
author | Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com> | 2015-04-20 13:32:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> | 2015-04-22 11:03:16 -0600 |
commit | 6e0c4880c877fae9ecfc4135b923e167d981e5e3 (patch) | |
tree | 794567ac9f4a88b43cad4ea457ebedf19818f87f | |
parent | 794d521917eab07651248174a81ba51cd265d9dc (diff) | |
download | u-boot-imx-6e0c4880c877fae9ecfc4135b923e167d981e5e3.zip u-boot-imx-6e0c4880c877fae9ecfc4135b923e167d981e5e3.tar.gz u-boot-imx-6e0c4880c877fae9ecfc4135b923e167d981e5e3.tar.bz2 |
dm: test: Add tests for get/find uclass's device by name
This commit introduces simple tests for functions:
- uclass_find_device_by_name()
- uclass_get_device_by_name()
Tests added by this commit:
- Test: dm_test_uclass_devices_find_by_name: for uclass id: UCLASS_TEST_FDT
* get uclass's devices by uclass_find_first/next_device() each as 'testdev',
* for each returned device, call: uclass_find_device_by_name(),
with previously returned device's name as an argument ('testdev->name').
* for the found device ('founddev') check if:
* founddev != NULL
* testdev == founddev
* testdev->name == founddev->name (by strcmp)
- Test: dm_test_uclass_devices_get_by_name: for uclass id: UCLASS_TEST_FDT
* get uclass's devices by uclass_get_first/next_device() each as 'testdev',
* for each returned device, call: uclass_get_device_by_name(),
with previously returned device's name as an argument ('testdev->name').
* for the found device ('founddev') check if:
* founddev != NULL
* founddev is active
* testdev == founddev
* testdev->name == founddev->name (by strcmp)
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
-rw-r--r-- | test/dm/core.c | 81 |
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/dm/core.c b/test/dm/core.c index 3a8dd1d..7f7b977 100644 --- a/test/dm/core.c +++ b/test/dm/core.c @@ -674,6 +674,43 @@ static int dm_test_uclass_devices_find(struct dm_test_state *dms) } DM_TEST(dm_test_uclass_devices_find, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA); +static int dm_test_uclass_devices_find_by_name(struct dm_test_state *dms) +{ + struct udevice *finddev; + struct udevice *testdev; + int findret, ret; + + /* + * For each test device found in fdt like: "a-test", "b-test", etc., + * use its name and try to find it by uclass_find_device_by_name(). + * Then, on success check if: + * - current 'testdev' name is equal to the returned 'finddev' name + * - current 'testdev' pointer is equal to the returned 'finddev' + * + * We assume that, each uclass's device name is unique, so if not, then + * this will fail on checking condition: testdev == finddev, since the + * uclass_find_device_by_name(), returns the first device by given name. + */ + for (ret = uclass_find_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_FDT, &testdev); + testdev; + ret = uclass_find_next_device(&testdev)) { + ut_assertok(ret); + ut_assert(testdev); + + findret = uclass_find_device_by_name(UCLASS_TEST_FDT, + testdev->name, + &finddev); + + ut_assertok(findret); + ut_assert(testdev); + ut_asserteq_str(testdev->name, finddev->name); + ut_asserteq_ptr(testdev, finddev); + } + + return 0; +} +DM_TEST(dm_test_uclass_devices_find_by_name, DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT); + static int dm_test_uclass_devices_get(struct dm_test_state *dms) { struct udevice *dev; @@ -691,6 +728,50 @@ static int dm_test_uclass_devices_get(struct dm_test_state *dms) } DM_TEST(dm_test_uclass_devices_get, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA); +static int dm_test_uclass_devices_get_by_name(struct dm_test_state *dms) +{ + struct udevice *finddev; + struct udevice *testdev; + int ret, findret; + + /* + * For each test device found in fdt like: "a-test", "b-test", etc., + * use its name and try to get it by uclass_get_device_by_name(). + * On success check if: + * - returned finddev' is active + * - current 'testdev' name is equal to the returned 'finddev' name + * - current 'testdev' pointer is equal to the returned 'finddev' + * + * We asserts that the 'testdev' is active on each loop entry, so we + * could be sure that the 'finddev' is activated too, but for sure + * we check it again. + * + * We assume that, each uclass's device name is unique, so if not, then + * this will fail on checking condition: testdev == finddev, since the + * uclass_get_device_by_name(), returns the first device by given name. + */ + for (ret = uclass_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_FDT, &testdev); + testdev; + ret = uclass_next_device(&testdev)) { + ut_assertok(ret); + ut_assert(testdev); + ut_assert(device_active(testdev)); + + findret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_TEST_FDT, + testdev->name, + &finddev); + + ut_assertok(findret); + ut_assert(finddev); + ut_assert(device_active(finddev)); + ut_asserteq_str(testdev->name, finddev->name); + ut_asserteq_ptr(testdev, finddev); + } + + return 0; +} +DM_TEST(dm_test_uclass_devices_get_by_name, DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT); + static int dm_test_device_get_uclass_id(struct dm_test_state *dms) { struct udevice *dev; |