# # (C) Copyright 2014 Google, Inc # Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> # # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ # DEPRECATION NOTICE FOR arch/<arch>/lib/board.c For board maintainers: Please submit patches for boards you maintain before July 2014, to make them use generic board. For architecture maintainers: Please submit patches to remove your architecture-specific board.c file before October 2014. Background ---------- U-Boot has traditionally had a board.c file for each architecture. This has introduced quite a lot of duplication, with each architecture tending to do initialisation slightly differently. To address this, a new 'generic board init' feature was introduced a year ago in March 2013 (further motivation is provided in the cover letter below). What has changed? ----------------- The main change is that the arch/<arch>/lib/board.c file is being removed in favour of common/board_f.c (for pre-relocation init) and common/board_r.c (for post-relocation init). Related to this, the global_data and bd_t structures now have a core set of fields which are common to all architectures. Architecture-specific fields have been moved to separate structures. Supported Arcthitectures ------------------------ If you are unlucky then your architecture may not support generic board. The following architectures are supported now: arc arm mips powerpc sandbox x86 If your architecture is not supported, you need to adjust your arch/<arch>/config.mk file to include: __HAVE_ARCH_GENERIC_BOARD := y and test it with a suitable board, as follows. Adding Support for your Board ----------------------------- To enable generic board for your board, define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD in your board config header file. Test that U-Boot still functions correctly on your board, and fix any problems you find. Don't be surprised if there are no problems - generic board has had a reasonable amount of testing with common boards. DeadLine -------- Please don't take this the wrong way - there is no intent to make your life miserable, and we have the greatest respect and admiration for U-Boot users. However, with any migration there has to be a period where the old way is deprecated and removed. Every patch to the deprecated code introduces a potential breakage in the new unused code. Therefore: Boards or architectures not converted over to general board by the end of 2014 may be forcibly changed over (potentially causing run-time breakage) or removed. Further Background ------------------ The full text of the original generic board series is reproduced below. --8<------------- This series creates a generic board.c implementation which contains the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files. What is the motivation for this change? 1. There is a lot of repeated code in the board.c files. Any change to things like setting up the baud rate requires a change in 10 separate places. 2. Since there are 10 separate files, adding a new feature which requires initialisation is painful since it must be independently added in 10 places. 3. As time goes by the architectures naturely diverge since there is limited pressure to compare features or even CONFIG options against simiilar things in other board.c files. 4. New architectures must implement all the features all over again, and sometimes in subtley different ways. This places an unfair burden on getting a new architecture fully functional and running with U-Boot. 5. While it is a bit of a tricky change, I believe it is worthwhile and achievable. There is no requirement that all code be common, only that the code that is common should be located in common/board.c rather than arch/xxx/lib/board.c. All the functions of board_init_f() and board_init_r() are broken into separate function calls so that they can easily be included or excluded for a particular architecture. It also makes it easier to adopt Graeme's initcall proposal when it is ready. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/114499.html This series removes the dependency on generic relocation. So relocation happens as one big chunk and is still completely arch-specific. See the relocation series for a proposed solution to this for ARM: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-December/112928.html or Graeme's recent x86 series v2: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/114467.html Instead of moving over a whole architecture, this series takes the approach of simply enabling generic board support for an architecture. It is then up to each board to opt in by defining CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD in the board config file. If this is not done, then the code will be generated as before. This allows both sets of code to co-exist until we are comfortable with the generic approach, and enough boards run. ARM is a relatively large board.c file and one which I can test, therefore I think it is a good target for this series. On the other hand, x86 is relatively small and simple, but different enough that it introduces a few issues to be solved. So I have chosen both ARM and x86 for this series. After a suggestion from Wolfgang I have added PPC also. This is the largest and most feature-full board, so hopefully we have all bases covered in this RFC. A generic global_data structure is also required. This might upset a few people. Here is my basic reasoning: most fields are the same, all architectures include and need it, most global_data.h files already have #ifdefs to select fields for a particular SOC, so it is hard to see why architecures are different in this area. We can perhaps add a way to put architecture-specific fields into a separate header file, but for now I have judged that to be counter-productive. Similarly we need a generic bd_info structure, since generic code will be accessing it. I have done this in the same way as global_data and the same comments apply. There was dicussion on the list about passing gd_t around as a parameter to pre-relocation init functions. I think this makes sense, but it can be done as a separate change, and this series does not require it. While this series needs to stand on its own (as with the link script cleanup series and the generic relocation series) the goal is the unification of the board init code. So I hope we can address issues with this in mind, rather than focusing too narrowly on particular ARM, x86 or PPC issues. I have run-tested ARM on Tegra Seaboard only. To try it out, define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD in your board file and rebuild. Most likely on x86 and PPC at least it will hang, but if you are lucky it will print something first :-) I have run this though MAKEALL with CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD on for all ARM, PPC and x86 boards. There are a few failures due to errors in the board config, which I have sent patches for. The main issue is just the difference between __bss_end and __bss_end__. Note: the first group of commits are required for this series to build, but could be separated out if required. I have included them here for convenience. ------------->8-- Simon Glass, sjg@chromium.org March 2014