From d923a5d59f2ca2ba4d31b424ff36ff282f858eb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Denk Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 23:36:18 +0000 Subject: MPC85xx: remove support for TQM85xx boards Due to grown code sizes the TQM85xx boards don't build any more with some older tool chains (like ELDK 4.2). As these boards have long reached EOL it seems a waste of effort trying to fix them. The vendor has agreed to drop support for them, too. So let's get rid of them. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Stefan Roese cc: Kim Phillips Acked-by: Stefan Roese --- drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c') diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c index 31c174b..11eb167 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void fun_wait(struct fsl_upm_nand *fun) debug("unexpected busy state\n"); } else { /* - * If the R/B pin is not connected, like on the TQM8548, + * If the R/B pin is not connected, * a short delay is necessary. */ udelay(1); @@ -115,10 +115,10 @@ static void fun_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl) fsl_upm_run_pattern(&fun->upm, fun->width, io_addr, mar); /* - * Some boards/chips needs this. At least the MPC8360E-RDK and - * TQM8548 need it. Probably weird chip, because I don't see - * any need for this on MPC8555E + Samsung K9F1G08U0A. Usually - * here are 0-2 unexpected busy states per block read. + * Some boards/chips needs this. At least the MPC8360E-RDK + * needs it. Probably weird chip, because I don't see any + * need for this on MPC8555E + Samsung K9F1G08U0A. Usually + * here are 0-2 unexpected busy states per block read. */ if (fun->wait_flags & FSL_UPM_WAIT_RUN_PATTERN) fun_wait(fun); -- cgit v1.1