From 12df2abe3e159d622701611766c085b860329f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:24:45 -0600 Subject: Reverse the meaning of the fit_config_verify() return code It is more common to have 0 mean OK, and -ve mean error. Change this function to work the same way to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- common/image-fit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'common/image-fit.c') diff --git a/common/image-fit.c b/common/image-fit.c index 732505a..40c7e27 100644 --- a/common/image-fit.c +++ b/common/image-fit.c @@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ int fit_image_load(bootm_headers_t *images, const char *prop_name, ulong addr, images->fit_uname_cfg = fit_uname_config; if (IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY && images->verify) { puts(" Verifying Hash Integrity ... "); - if (!fit_config_verify(fit, cfg_noffset)) { + if (fit_config_verify(fit, cfg_noffset)) { puts("Bad Data Hash\n"); bootstage_error(bootstage_id + BOOTSTAGE_SUB_HASH); -- cgit v1.1