From 6b59e03e0237a40a2305ea385defdfd92000978b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Haavard Skinnemoen Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:21:22 +0200 Subject: lcd: Let the board code show board-specific info The information displayed when CONFIG_LCD_INFO is set is inherently board-specific, so it should be done by the board code. The current code dealing with this only handles two cases, and is already a horrible mess of #ifdeffery. Yes, this duplicates some code, but it also allows boards to print more board-specific information; this used to be very difficult. Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin --- board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) (limited to 'board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c') diff --git a/board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c b/board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c index 76f56d6..70f1db9 100644 --- a/board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c +++ b/board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c @@ -209,6 +209,35 @@ static void at91sam9261ek_lcd_hw_init(void) gd->fb_base = AT91SAM9261_SRAM_BASE; } + +#ifdef CONFIG_LCD_INFO +#include +#include + +void lcd_show_board_info(void) +{ + ulong dram_size, nand_size; + int i; + char temp[32]; + + lcd_printf ("%s\n", U_BOOT_VERSION); + lcd_printf ("(C) 2008 ATMEL Corp\n"); + lcd_printf ("at91support@atmel.com\n"); + lcd_printf ("%s CPU at %s MHz\n", + AT91_CPU_NAME, + strmhz(temp, AT91_MAIN_CLOCK)); + + dram_size = 0; + for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; i++) + dram_size += gd->bd->bi_dram[i].size; + nand_size = 0; + for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE; i++) + nand_size += nand_info[i].size; + lcd_printf (" %ld MB SDRAM, %ld MB NAND\n", + dram_size >> 20, + nand_size >> 20 ); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_LCD_INFO */ #endif int board_init(void) -- cgit v1.1