From 262f08d6ea18a62f827b8ccb60f355ca2eaf6e2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Simek Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:02 +0200 Subject: zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init() Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack pointer is setup after function call in _main(). Move architecture setup to arch_cpu_init() which is call as the first function in board_init_f() which already have correct stack pointer. Reported-by: Sven Schwermer Signed-off-by: Michal Simek --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/arm/cpu') diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c index 4914986..2bb3843 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ void lowlevel_init(void) { +} + +int arch_cpu_init(void) +{ zynq_slcr_unlock(); /* remap DDR to zero, FILTERSTART */ writel(0, &scu_base->filter_start); @@ -31,6 +35,8 @@ void lowlevel_init(void) writel(0xC, &slcr_base->ddr_urgent); zynq_slcr_lock(); + + return 0; } void reset_cpu(ulong addr) -- cgit v1.1