From 73671dad49bf2368959b7bf0e30ba931ea95565c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Betker Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 20:07:56 +0200 Subject: Check run_command() return code properly run_command() returns 0 for success, 1 for failure. Fix places which assume that failure is indicated by a negative return code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Betker Acked-by: Simon Glass Tested-by: Simon Glass Tested-by: Stefan Roese --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c index 0937506..da80240 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static void kw_sysrst_action(void) debug("Starting %s process...\n", __FUNCTION__); ret = run_command(s, 0); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret != 0) debug("Error.. %s failed\n", __FUNCTION__); else debug("%s process finished\n", __FUNCTION__); -- cgit v1.1