Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|
* | test: Generalize the unit test framework | Joe Hershberger | 2015-05-21 | -4/+4 |
| | | | | | | | | | Separate the ability to define tests and assert status of test functions from the dm tests so they can be used more consistently throughout all tests. Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> | |||
* | dm: spi: Move slave details to child platdata | Simon Glass | 2015-01-29 | -3/+3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | At present we go through various contortions to store the SPI slave's chip select in its private data. This only exists when the slave is active so must be set up when it is probed. Until the device is probed we don't actually know what chip select it will appear on. However, now that we can support per-child platform data, we can use that instead. This allows us to set up the chip select when the child is bound, and avoid the messy contortions. Unfortunately this is a fairly large change and it seems to be difficult to break it down further. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> | |||
* | dm: spi: Add tests | Simon Glass | 2014-10-22 | -0/+127 |
These tests use SPI flash (and the sandbox emulation) to operate. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Acked-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jagannadh.teki@gmail.com> |