| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing code assumes the SDRAM row refresh period should always
be 15.6 us. This is not always true, and indeed on the ATNGW100, the
refresh rate should really be 7.81 us.
Add a refresh_period member to struct sdram_info and initialize it
properly for both ATSTK1000 and ATNGW100. Out-of-tree boards will
panic() until the refresh_period member is updated properly.
Big thanks to Gerhard Berghofer for pointing out this issue.
Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a chip-features file providing definitions of the form
AT32AP700x_CHIP_HAS_<peripheral>
to indicate the availability of the given peripheral on the currently
selected chip.
Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
|
|
|
The SoC-specific code for all the AT32AP700x CPUs is practically
identical; the only difference is that some chips have less features
than others. By doing this rename, we can add support for the AP7000
derivatives simply by making some features conditional.
Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
|
