| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The hush shell dynamically allocates (and re-allocates) memory for the
argument strings in the "char *argv[]" argument vector passed to
commands. Any code that modifies these pointers will cause serious
corruption of the malloc data structures and crash U-Boot, so make
sure the compiler can check that no such modifications are being done
by changing the code into "char * const argv[]".
This modification is the result of debugging a strange crash caused
after adding a new command, which used the following argument
processing code which has been working perfectly fine in all Unix
systems since version 6 - but not so in U-Boot:
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
while (--argc > 0 && **++argv == '-') {
/* ====> */ while (*++*argv) {
switch (**argv) {
case 'd':
debug++;
break;
...
default:
usage ();
}
}
}
...
}
The line marked "====>" will corrupt the malloc data structures and
usually cause U-Boot to crash when the next command gets executed by
the shell. With the modification, the compiler will prevent this with
an
error: increment of read-only location '*argv'
N.B.: The code above can be trivially rewritten like this:
while (--argc > 0 && **++argv == '-') {
char *arg = *argv;
while (*++arg) {
switch (*arg) {
...
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Building examples/standalone/eepro100_eeprom triggers this error:
In file included from include/common.h:629,
from eepro100_eeprom.c:24:
include/net.h: In function 'NetReadIP':
include/net.h:430: warning: implicit declaration of function 'memcpy'
eepro100_eeprom.c: At top level:
eepro100_eeprom.c:81: error: conflicting types for 'memcpy'
include/net.h:430: error: previous implicit declaration of 'memcpy' was here
Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
The current files in examples are all standalone application examples,
so put them in their own subdirectory for organizational purposes
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
|