| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At present we go through various contortions to store the SPI slave's chip
select in its private data. This only exists when the slave is active so
must be set up when it is probed. Until the device is probed we don't
actually know what chip select it will appear on.
However, now that we can support per-child platform data, we can use that
instead. This allows us to set up the chip select when the child is bound,
and avoid the messy contortions.
Unfortunately this is a fairly large change and it seems to be difficult to
break it down further.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At present we use struct spi_slave as our device pointer in a lot of places
to avoid changing the old SPI API. At some point this will go away.
But for now, it is better if the SPI uclass sets up this pointer, rather
than relying on passing it into the device when it is probed. We can use the
new uclass child_pre_probe() method to do this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is common to all SPI drivers and specifies a structure used by the
uclass. It makes more sense to define it in the uclass.
Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At present we try to use the 'reg' property and device tree aliases to give
devices a sequence number. The 'reg' property is often actually a memory
address, so the sequence numbers thus-obtained are not useful. It would be
better if the devices were just sequentially numbered in that case. In fact
neither I2C nor SPI use this feature, so drop it.
Some devices need us to look up an alias to number them within the uclass.
Add a flag to control this, so it is not done unless it is needed.
Adjust the tests to test this new behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The SPI function does the same thing, so we may as well just use the new
generic function. The 'cs' parameter was not actually used, so can be
dropped.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jagannadh.teki@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This code was not updated when the chip select handling was adjusted. Fix
it to call the correct function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jagannadh.teki@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
U-Boot has never cared about the type when we get max/min of two
values, but Linux Kernel does. This commit gets min, max, min3, max3
macros synced with the kernel introducing type checks.
Many of references of those macros must be fixed to suppress warnings.
We have two options:
- Use min, max, min3, max3 only when the arguments have the same type
(or add casts to the arguments)
- Use min_t/max_t instead with the appropriate type for the first
argument
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
[trini: Fixup arch/blackfin/lib/string.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Add a uclass which provides access to SPI buses and includes operations
required by SPI.
For a time driver model will need to co-exist with the legacy SPI interface
so some parts of the header file are changed depending on which is in use.
The exports are adjusted also since some functions are not available with
driver model.
Boards must define CONFIG_DM_SPI to use driver model for SPI.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jagannadh.teki@gmail.com>
(Discussed some follow-up comments which will address in future add-ons)
|