summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-uclass.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeLines
* libfdt: Bring in upstream stringlist functionsSimon Glass2016-10-13-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | These have now landed upstream. The naming is different and in one case the function signature has changed. Update the code to match. This applies the following upstream commits by Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> : 604e61e fdt: Add functions to retrieve strings 8702bd1 fdt: Add a function to get the index of a string 2218387 fdt: Add a function to count strings Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* pinctrl: fix typos in comment blocks of pinconfig_post_bind()Masahiro Yamada2016-08-20-2/+2
| | | | | | '-' is never used in function names. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
* pinctrl: add the DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS flag for numbering the devicesThomas Abraham2016-05-25-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | It is possible to have multiple pin controllers in the system. Use the DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS flag so that the pinctrl instances are assigned a sequence number. Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
* dm: pinctrl: Add a way for a GPIO driver to obtain a pin functionSimon Glass2016-01-21-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | GPIO drivers want to be able to show if a pin is enabled for input, output, or is being used by another function. Some drivers can easily find this and the code is included in the driver. For some SoCs this is more complex. Conceptually this should be handled by pinctrl rather than GPIO. Most pinctrl drivers will have this feature anyway. Add a method by which a GPIO driver can obtain the pin mux value given a GPIO reference. This avoids repeating the code in two places. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* dm: pinctrl: Add a function to parse PIN_CONFIG flagsSimon Glass2016-01-21-0/+12
| | | | | | | | Add a function which produces a flags word from a few common PIN_CONFIG settings. This is useful for simple pinctrl drivers that don't need to worry about drive strength, etc. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* pinctrl: Avoid binding all pinconfig nodes before relocationSimon Glass2016-01-20-0/+4
| | | | | | | | This can create a large number of pinctrl devices. It chews up early malloc() memory and takes time. Only bind those which are marked as needed before relocation. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* pinctrl: move dm_scan_fdt_node() out of pinctrl uclassMasahiro Yamada2015-09-19-6/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit c5acf4a2b3c6 ("pinctrl: Add the concept of peripheral IDs") added some additional change that was not mentioned in the git-log. That commit added dm_scan_fdt_node() in the pinctrl uclass binding. It should be handled by the simple-bus driver or the low-level driver, not by the pinctrl framework. I guess Simon's motivation was to bind GPIO banks located under the Rockchip pinctrl device. It is true some chips have sub-devices under their pinctrl devices, but it is basically SoC-specific matter. This commit partly reverts commit c5acf4a2b3c6 to keep the only pinctrl-generic features in the uclass. The dm_scan_fdt_node() should be called from the rk3288_pinctrl driver. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* pinctrl: Add the concept of peripheral IDsSimon Glass2015-09-02-9/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | My original pinctrl patch operating using a peripheral ID enum. This was shared between pinmux and clock and provides an easy way to specify a device that needs to be controlled, even it is does not (yet) have a driver within driver model. Masahiro's new simple pinctrl gets around this by providing a set_state_simple() pinctrl method. By passing a device to that call the peripheral ID becomes unnecessary. If the driver needs it, it can calculate it itself and use it internally. However this does not solve the problem for peripheral clocks. The 'pure' solution would be to pass a driver to the clock uclass also. But this requires that all devices should have a driver, and a struct udevide. Also a key optimisation of the clock uclass is allowing a peripheral clock to be set even when there is no device for that clock. There may be a better way to achive the same goal, but for now it seems expedient to add in peripheral ID to the pinctrl uclass. Two methods are added - one to get the peripheral ID and one to select it. The existing set_state_simple() is effectively the union of these. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* pinctrl: add pin control uclass supportMasahiro Yamada2015-08-31-0/+240
This creates a new framework for handling of pin control devices, i.e. devices that control different aspects of package pins. This uclass handles pinmuxing and pin configuration; pinmuxing controls switching among silicon blocks that share certain physical pins, pin configuration handles electronic properties such as pin- biasing, load capacitance etc. This framework can support the same device tree bindings, but if you do not need full interface support, you can disable some features to reduce memory foot print. Typically around 1.5KB is necessary to include full-featured uclass support on ARM board (CONFIG_PINCTRL + CONFIG_PINCTRL_FULL + CONFIG_PINCTRL_GENERIC + CONFIG_PINCTRL_PINMUX), for example. We are often limited on code size for SPL. Besides, we still have many boards that do not support device tree configuration. The full pinctrl, which requires OF_CONTROL, does not make sense for those boards. So, this framework also has a Do-It-Yourself (let's say simple pinctrl) interface. With CONFIG_PINCTRL_FULL disabled, the uclass itself provides no systematic mechanism for identifying the peripheral device, applying pinctrl settings, etc. They must be done in each low-level driver. In return, you can save much memory footprint and it might be useful especially for SPL. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>