summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeLines
* Revert "x86: broadwell: gpio: Remove the codes to set up pin control"Simon Glass2016-10-11-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This makes the assumption that setting up pinctrl in cpu_init_r() is safe. On samus we need GPIOs before relocation in order to support power control. This commit fixes the following message on boot: initcall sequence ffe5c6f4 failed at call ffe01d3d (err=-1) ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ### In any case it seems better to leave init to driver model, so that it can pick up the GPIO driver when it needs it. Since pinctrl is a dependency of the GPIO driver, we may as well put the dependency there and avoid these problems. This reverts commit 9769e05bcf79939bad23a719982dd1f85a110f3c. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
* x86: broadwell: gpio: Remove the codes to set up pin controlBin Meng2016-06-12-7/+0
| | | | | | | | | Now that we have set up pin control in cpu_init_r(), remove the duplicated codes in the broadwell gpio driver. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* gpio: intel_broadwell: remove gpio_xlate routineEric Nelson2016-05-17-10/+0
| | | | | | | | With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the intel_broadwell driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* x86: broadwell: Add a GPIO driverSimon Glass2016-03-17-0/+198
Add a GPIO driver for the GPIO peripheral found on broadwell devices. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Acked-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>