| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Many of the spd.h #includers don't need it,
and wanted to have spd_sdram() declared instead.
Since they didn't get that, some also had open
coded extern declarations of it instead or as well.
Fix it all up by using spd_sdram.h where needed.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We should be using the _MEM_PHYS for LAW and TLB setup and not _MEM_BASE.
While _MEM_BASE & _MEM_PHYS are normally the same, _MEM_BASE should only
be used for configuring the PCI ATMU.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With recent toolchain versions, some boards would not build because
or errors like this one (here for ocotea board when building with
ELDK 4.2 beta):
ppc_4xx-ld: section .bootpg [fffff000 -> fffff23b] overlaps section .bss [fffee900 -> fffff8ab]
For many boards, the .bss section is big enough that it wraps around
at the end of the address space (0xFFFFFFFF), so the problem will not
be visible unless you use a 64 bit tool chain for development. On
some boards however, changes to the code size (due to different
optimizations) we bail out with section overlaps like above.
The fix is to add the NOLOAD attribute to the .bss and .sbss
sections, telling the linker that .bss does not consume any space in
the image.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Add support for Wind River's SBC8548 reference board.
Signed-off by: Joe Hamman <joe.hamman@embeddedspecialties.com>
|
|
|
Add support for Wind River's SBC8548 reference board.
Signed-off by: Joe Hamman <joe.hamman@embeddedspecialties.com>
Signed-off by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
