| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In a number of places we had wordings of the GPL (or LGPL in a few
cases) license text that were split in such a way that it wasn't caught
previously. Convert all of these to the correct SPDX-License-Identifier
tag.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix ccsr_ddr structure to avoid using typedef. Combine DDR2 and DDR3
structure for 83xx, 85xx and 86xx.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Freescale DDR driver has been used for mpc83xx, mpc85xx, mpc86xx SoCs.
The similar DDR controllers will be used for ARM-based SoCs.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were a number of shared files that were using
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR, or CONFIG_SYS_MPC86xx_DDR_ADDR, and
several variants (DDR2, DDR3). A recent patchset added
85xx-specific ones to code which was used by 86xx systems.
After reviewing places where these constants were used, and
noting that the type definitions of the pointers assigned to
point to those addresses were the same, the cleanest approach
to fixing this problem was to unify the namespace for the
85xx, 83xx, and 86xx DDR address definitions.
This patch does:
s/CONFIG_SYS_MPC8.xx_DDR/CONFIG_SYS_MPC8xxx_DDR/g
All 85xx, 86xx, and 83xx have been built with this change.
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Existing boards by default have an issue where the LBC SDRAM
SPD EEPROM and the DDR2 SDRAM SPD EEPROM both land at 0x51.
After the hardware modification listed in the README is made,
then the DDR2 SPD EEPROM appears at 0x53. So this implements
a board specific get_spd() by taking advantage of the existing
weak linkage, that 1st tries reading at 0x53 and then if that
fails, it falls back to the old 0x51.
Since the old dependency issue of "SPD implies no LBC SDRAM"
gets removed with the hardware errata fix, remove that restriction
in the code, so both LBC SDRAM and SPD can be selected.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nothing to see here, just a relocation of the fixed ddr init
sequence to live in the actual ddr.c file itself.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move fsl_ddr_get_spd into common mpc8xxx/ddr/main.c as most boards
pretty much do the same thing. The only variations are in how many
controllers or DIMMs per controller exist. To make this work we
standardize on the names of the SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS defines based on the
use case of the board.
We allow boards to override get_spd to either do board specific fixups
to the SPD data or deal with any unique behavior of how the SPD eeproms
are wired up.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Every 85xx board implements fsl_ddr_get_mem_data_rate via get_ddr_freq()
and every 86xx board uses get_bus_freq(). If implement get_ddr_freq()
as a static inline to call get_bus_freq() we can remove
fsl_ddr_get_mem_data_rate altogether and just call get_ddr_freq()
directly.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because some dimm parameters like n_ranks needs to be used with the board
frequency to choose the board parameters like clk_adjust etc. in the
board_specific_paramesters table of the board ddr file, we need to pass
the dimm parameters to the board file.
* move ddr dimm parameters header file from /cpu to /include directory.
* add ddr dimm parameters to populate board specific options.
* Fix fsl_ddr_board_options() for all the 8xxx boards which call this function.
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang <Haiying.Wang@freescale.com>
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
