| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Freescale DDR driver has been used for mpc83xx, mpc85xx, mpc86xx SoCs.
The similar DDR controllers will be used for ARM-based SoCs.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Enable TPL for p1_p2_rdb_pc nand boot.
Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <b40530@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When P1021RDB-PC reboot system, the board will hung at uboot DDR
configuration. For P1021RDB-PC DDR reset pin is multiplex with
QE, so uboot will reserve this pin for QE and skip DDR reset.
Other platforms without QE will do this reset. This patch adds
a slight code to reset DDR chip by QE CE_PB8 pin for NAND and
NOR FLASH boot. For booting from SPI FALSH and SD card, it
seems possible to use the rom on chip to write to the GPIO
pins before configuring the DDR.
Signed-off-by: Xu Jiucheng <B37781@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie Xiaobo <X.Xie@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were a number of shared files that were using
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR, or CONFIG_SYS_MPC86xx_DDR_ADDR, and
several variants (DDR2, DDR3). A recent patchset added
85xx-specific ones to code which was used by 86xx systems.
After reviewing places where these constants were used, and
noting that the type definitions of the pointers assigned to
point to those addresses were the same, the cleanest approach
to fixing this problem was to unify the namespace for the
85xx, 83xx, and 86xx DDR address definitions.
This patch does:
s/CONFIG_SYS_MPC8.xx_DDR/CONFIG_SYS_MPC8xxx_DDR/g
All 85xx, 86xx, and 83xx have been built with this change.
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows DDR configuration to be deferred to the final U-Boot image,
which is able to make use of SPD data. The SPL itself cannot use SPD due
to code size constraints. It previously used fixed register values for
DDR configuration, and those values did not work on the p2020rdb-pca
board I tested with. It's possible that different revisions of the board
require different settings. Using SPD eliminates that problem.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
|
|
Introduces CONFIG_SPL_RELOC_TEXT_BASE and CONFIG_SPL_RELOC_STACK.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
