| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The 8544 DS doesn't have any cacheable Local Bus memories set up. By mapping
space for some anyway, we were allowing speculative loads into unmapped space,
which would cause an exception (annoying, even if ultimately harmless).
Removing LBC_CACHE_BASE, and using LBC_NONCACHE_BASE for the LBC LAW solves the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the new LAW interface (set_next_law) we can move to letting the
system allocate which LAWs are used for what purpose. This makes life
a bit easier going forward with the new DDR code.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|