summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeLines
* Convert CONFIG_SPL_DRIVERS_MISC_SUPPORT to KconfigSimon Glass2016-09-16-3/+0
| | | | | | Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* Convert CONFIG_SPL_HASH_SUPPORT to KconfigSimon Glass2016-09-16-1/+0
| | | | | | Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* Convert CONFIG_SPL_CRYPTO_SUPPORT to KconfigSimon Glass2016-09-16-1/+0
| | | | | | Move this option to Kconfig and tidy up existing uses. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* Move existing use of CONFIG_SPL_RSA to KconfigSimon Glass2016-09-16-1/+0
| | | | | | | A few boards define this in a header file which is incorrect. It means that Kconfig options that rely on this cannot be used. Move it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* Move existing use of CONFIG_SPL_DM to KconfigSimon Glass2016-09-16-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A few boards define this in a header file which is incorrect. It means that Kconfig options that rely on this cannot be used. Move it. Note that quite a few boards defined this options but do not appear to actually use SPL: BSC9132QDS_NOR_DDRCLK100_SECURE BSC9132QDS_NOR_DDRCLK133_SECURE BSC9132QDS_SDCARD_DDRCLK100_SECURE BSC9132QDS_SDCARD_DDRCLK133_SECURE BSC9132QDS_SPIFLASH_DDRCLK100_SECURE BSC9132QDS_SPIFLASH_DDRCLK133_SECURE C29XPCIE_NOR_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PA_NAND_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PA_NOR_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_NOR_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PB_NAND_SECBOOT P1010RDB-PB_NOR_SECBOOT P3041DS_SECURE_BOOT P4080DS_SECURE_BOOT P5020DS_NAND_SECURE_BOOT P5040DS_SECURE_BOOT T1023RDB_SECURE_BOOT T1024QDS_DDR4_SECURE_BOOT T1024QDS_SECURE_BOOT T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT T1040RDB_SECURE_BOOT T1042D4RDB_SECURE_BOOT T1042RDB_SECURE_BOOT T2080QDS_SECURE_BOOT T2080RDB_SECURE_BOOT T4160QDS_SECURE_BOOT T4240QDS_SECURE_BOOT ls1021aqds_nor_SECURE_BOOT ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT ls1043ardb_SECURE_BOOT For these boards CONFIG_SPL_DM will no-longer be defined in SPL. But since they apparently don't have an SPL, this should not matter. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* arm: fsl: Adjust ordering of #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILDSimon Glass2016-09-16-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | The secure boot header files incorrectly define SPL options only if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is defined. This means that the options are only enabled in an SPL build, and not with a normal 'make xxx_defconfig'. This means that moveconfig.py cannot work, since it sees the options as disabled even when they may be manually enabled in an SPL build. Fix this by changing the order. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* SECURE_BOOT: Enable SD as a source for bootscriptSumit Garg2016-07-26-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | Add support for reading bootscript and bootscript header from SD. Also renamed macros *_FLASH to *_DEVICE to represent SD alongwith NAND and NOR flash. Reviewed-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: T104x: Add nand secure boot targetSumit Garg2016-07-21-1/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For mpc85xx SoCs, the core begins execution from address 0xFFFFFFFC. In non-secure boot scenario from NAND, this address will map to CPC configured as SRAM. But in case of secure boot, this default address always maps to IBR (Internal Boot ROM). The IBR code requires that the bootloader(U-boot) must lie in 0 to 3.5G address space i.e. 0x0 - 0xDFFFFFFF. For secure boot target from NAND, the text base for SPL is kept same as non-secure boot target i.e. 0xFFFx_xxxx but the SPL U-boot binary will be copied to CPC configured as SRAM with address in 0-3.5G(0xBFFC_0000) As a the virtual and physical address of CPC would be different. The virtual address 0xFFFx_xxxx needs to be mapped to physical address 0xBFFx_xxxx. Create a new PBI file to configure CPC as SRAM with address 0xBFFC0000 and update DCFG SCRTACH1 register with location of Header required for secure boot. The changes are similar to commit 467a40dfe35f48d830f01a72617207d03ca85b4d powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND secure boot target for P3041 While P3041 has a 1MB CPC and does not require SPL. On T104x, CPC is only 256K and thus SPL framework is used. The changes are only applicable for SPL U-Boot running out of CPC SRAM and not the next level U-Boot loaded on DDR. Reviewed-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Enable chain of trust in SPLSumit Garg2016-07-21-1/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As part of Chain of Trust for Secure boot, the SPL U-Boot will validate the next level U-boot image. Add a new function spl_validate_uboot to perform the validation. Enable hardware crypto operations in SPL using SEC block. In case of Secure Boot, PAMU is not bypassed. For allowing SEC block access to CPC configured as SRAM, configure PAMU. Reviewed-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
* Kconfig: Move CONFIG_FIT and related options to KconfigSimon Glass2016-03-14-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are already two FIT options in Kconfig but the CONFIG options are still in the header files. We need to do a proper move to fix this. Move these options to Kconfig and tidy up board configuration: CONFIG_FIT CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP CONFIG_OF_SYSTEM_SETUP CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE CONFIG_FIT_BEST_MATCH CONFIG_FIT_VERBOSE CONFIG_OF_STDOUT_VIA_ALIAS CONFIG_RSA Unfortunately the first one is a little complicated. We need to make sure this option is not enabled in SPL by this change. Also this option is enabled automatically in the host builds by defining CONFIG_FIT in the image.h file. To solve this, add a new IMAGE_USE_FIT #define which can be used in files that are built on the host but must also build for U-Boot and SPL. Note: Masahiro's moveconfig.py script is amazing. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> [trini: Add microblaze change, various configs/ re-applies] Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
* freescale: Remove CONFIG_DM from header filesSimon Glass2016-03-14-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | Kconfig options must defined in the defconfig files. Since RSA_SOFTWARE_EXP relies on CONFIG_DM, unless it is set in kconfig we cannot enable RSA. Remove the hacks which enable CONFIG_DM in header files and update the defconfig. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* secure_boot: enable chain of trust for PowerPC platformsAneesh Bansal2016-01-27-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Chain of Trust is enabled for PowerPC platforms for Secure Boot. CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT is defined. In board_late_init(), fsl_setenv_chain_of_trust() is called which will perform the following: - If boot mode is non-secure, return (No Change) - If boot mode is secure, set the following environmet variables: bootdelay = 0 (To disable Boot Prompt) bootcmd = CONFIG_CHAIN_BOOT_CMD (Validate and execute Boot script) Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
* secure_boot: split the secure boot functionality in two partsAneesh Bansal2016-01-27-17/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are two phases in Secure Boot 1. ISBC: In BootROM, validate the BootLoader (U-Boot). 2. ESBC: In U-Boot, continuing the Chain of Trust by validating and booting LINUX. For ESBC phase, there is no difference in SoC's based on ARM or PowerPC cores. But the exit conditions after ISBC phase i.e. entry conditions for U-Boot are different for ARM and PowerPC. PowerPC: If Secure Boot is executed, a separate U-Boot target is required which must be compiled with a diffrent Text Base as compared to Non-Secure Boot. There are some LAW and TLB settings which are required specifically for Secure Boot scenario. ARM: ARM based SoC's have a fixed memory map and exit conditions from BootROM are same irrespective of boot mode (Secure or Non-Secure). Thus the current Secure Boot functionlity has been split into two parts: CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST This will have the following functionality as part of U-Boot: 1. Enable commands like esbc_validate, esbc_halt 2. Change the environment settings based on bootmode, determined at run time: - If bootmode is non-secure, no change - If bootmode is secure, set the following: - bootdelay = 0 (Don't give boot prompt) - bootcmd = Validate and execute the bootscript. CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT This is defined only for creating a different compile time target for secure boot. Traditionally, both these functionalities were defined under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT. This patch is aimed at removing the requirement for a separate Secure Boot target for ARM based SoC's. CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST will be defined and boot mode will be determine at run time. Another Security Requirement for running CHAIN_OF_TRUST is that U-Boot environemnt must not be picked from flash/external memory. This cannot be done based on bootmode at run time in current U-Boot architecture. Once this dependency is resolved, no separate SECURE_BOOT target will be required for ARM based SoC's. Currently, the only code under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT for ARM SoC's is defining CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
* secure_boot: include/configs: move definition of CONFIG_CMD_BLOBAneesh Bansal2016-01-27-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | CONFIG_CMD_BLOB must be defined in case of Secure Boot. It was earlier defined in all config files. The definition has been moved to a common file which is included by all configs. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
* SECURE_BOOT: Disable IE Key feature for RAMBOOTAneesh Bansal2015-09-01-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | ISBC Key Extension feature is not applicable for RAMBOOT as there is no way to retrieve the CSF Header and validated IE Key table from SRAM once CPC has been disabled. The feature is only applicable in case of NOR SECURE BOOT. Code Cleanup: The SECURE_BOOT specific defines have been moved from arch-ls102xa/config.h to arm/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT-Copy Boot Script on RAMAneesh Bansal2015-07-31-0/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | For running Chain of Trust when doing Secure Boot from NAND, the Bootscript header and bootscript must be copied from NAND to RAM(DDR). The addresses and commands for the same have been defined. Signed-off-by: Saksham Jain <saksham@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND secure boot target for P3041Aneesh Bansal2015-07-31-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Secure Boot Target is added for NAND for P3041. For mpc85xx SoCs, the core begins execution from address 0xFFFFFFFC. In case of secure boot, this default address maps to Boot ROM. The Boot ROM code requires that the bootloader(U-boot) must lie in 0 to 3.5G address space i.e. 0x0 - 0xDFFFFFFF. In case of NAND Secure Boot, CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT is enabled and CPC is configured as SRAM. U-Boot binary will be located on SRAM configured at address 0xBFF00000. In the U-Boot code, TLB entries are created to map the virtual address 0xFFF00000 to physical address 0xBFF00000 of CPC configured as SRAM. Signed-off-by: Saksham Jain <saksham@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/T104xD4: Add Secure boot support for T104xD4RDB platformsgaurav rana2015-07-28-0/+2
| | | | | | | | defconfig files are added and SFP version for these platforms is updated. Signed-off-by: Gaurav Rana <gaurav.rana@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* Add bootscript support to esbc_validate.gaurav rana2015-04-21-0/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. Default environment will be used for secure boot flow which can't be edited or saved. 2. Command for secure boot is predefined in the default environment which will run on autoboot (and autoboot is the only option allowed in case of secure boot) and it looks like this: #define CONFIG_SECBOOT \ "setenv bs_hdraddr 0xe8e00000;" \ "esbc_validate $bs_hdraddr;" \ "source $img_addr;" \ "esbc_halt;" #endif 3. Boot Script can contain esbc_validate commands and bootm command. Uboot source command used in default secure boot command will run the bootscript. 4. Command esbc_halt added to ensure either bootm executes after validation of images or core should just spin. Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Rana <gaurav.rana@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* SECURE_BOOT : enable esbc_validate command for powerpc and arm platforms.gaurav rana2015-03-05-0/+35
| | | | | | | | | | esbc_validate command uses various IP Blocks: Security Monitor, CAAM block and SFP registers. Hence the respective CONFIG's are enabled. Apart from these CONFIG_SHA_PROG_HW_ACCEL and CONFIG_RSA are also enabled. Signed-off-by: Gaurav Rana <gaurav.rana@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: Define PBI Flash Base for C29XPCIE Secure BootAneesh Bansal2015-01-16-0/+2
| | | | | | | CONFIG_SYS_PBI_FLASH_BASE is defined for Secure Boot on C29X Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: Add T1024/T1023 SoC supportShengzhou Liu2014-12-05-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add support for Freescale T1024/T1023 SoC. The T1024 SoC includes the following function and features: - Two 64-bit Power architecture e5500 cores, up to 1.4GHz - private 256KB L2 cache each core and shared 256KB CoreNet platform cache (CPC) - 32-/64-bit DDR3L/DDR4 SDRAM memory controller with ECC and interleaving support - Data Path Acceleration Architecture (DPAA) incorporating acceleration - Four MAC for 1G/2.5G/10G network interfaces (RGMII, SGMII, QSGMII, XFI) - High-speed peripheral interfaces - Three PCI Express 2.0 controllers - Additional peripheral interfaces - One SATA 2.0 controller - Two USB 2.0 controllers with integrated PHY - Enhanced secure digital host controller (SD/eSDHC/eMMC) - Enhanced serial peripheral interface (eSPI) - Four I2C controllers - Four 2-pin UARTs or two 4-pin UARTs - Integrated Flash Controller supporting NAND and NOR flash - Two 8-channel DMA engines - Multicore programmable interrupt controller (PIC) - LCD interface (DIU) with 12 bit dual data rate - QUICC Engine block supporting TDM, HDLC, and UART - Deep Sleep power implementaion (wakeup from GPIO/Timer/Ethernet/USB) - Support for hardware virtualization and partitioning enforcement - QorIQ Platform's Trust Architecture 2.0 Differences between T1024 and T1023: Feature T1024 T1023 QUICC Engine: yes no DIU: yes no Deep Sleep: yes no I2C controller: 4 3 DDR: 64-bit 32-bit IFC: 32-bit 28-bit Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for T2080RDBAneesh Bansal2014-05-13-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Secure Boot Target is added for T2080RDB Changes: For Secure boot, CPC is configured as SRAM and used as house keeping area which needs to be disabled. So CONFIG_SYS_CPC_REINIT_F is defined for CONFIG_T2080RDB. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- secure boot target for t1040rdbAneesh Bansal2014-05-13-1/+1
| | | | | | | | T1040RDB.h file is removed and a unified file T104xRDB.h is created. Hence macro CONFIG_T1040 is renamed to CONFIG_T104x. Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kumar Rana <gaurav.rana@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for T1040QDS and T1040RDBAneesh Bansal2014-04-22-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Secure Boot Target is added for T1040QDS and T1040RDB Changes: For Secure boot, CPC is configured as SRAM and used as house keeping area which needs to be disabled. So CONFIG_SYS_CPC_REINIT_F is defined for CONFIG_T1040QDS and CONFIG_T1040RDB Signed-off-by: Gaurav Rana <gaurav.rana@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for T2080QDSAneesh Bansal2014-04-22-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | Secure Boot Target is added for T2080QDS Changes: For Secure boot, CPC is configured as SRAM and used as house keeping area which needs to be disabled. So CONFIG_SYS_CPC_REINIT_F is defined for CONFIG_T2080QDS. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for T4240QDS and T4160QDSAneesh Bansal2014-04-22-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Secure Boot Target is added for T4240QDS and T4160QDS Changes: For Secure boot, CPC is configured as SRAM and used as house keeping area which needs to be disabled. So CONFIG_SYS_CPC_REINIT_F is defined for CONFIG_T4240QDS. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for B4860QDSAneesh Bansal2014-04-22-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Changes: 1. L2 cache is being invalidated by Boot ROM code for e6500 core. So removing the invalidation from start.S 2. Clear the LAW and corresponding configuration for CPC. Boot ROM code uses it as hosekeeping area. 3. For Secure boot, CPC is configured as SRAM and used as house keeping area. This configuration is to be disabled once in uboot. Earlier this disabling of CPC as SRAM was happening in cpu_init_r. As a result cache invalidation function was getting skipped in case CPC is configured as SRAM.This was causing random crashes. Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for BSC9132QDSAneesh Bansal2014-04-22-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | Add NOR, SPI and SD secure boot targets for BSC9132QDS. Changes: - Debug TLB entry is not required for Secure Boot Target. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
* powerpc: add CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT condition into fsl_secure_boot.hPo Liu2013-10-16-0/+2
| | | | | | | This patch is for board config file not to add CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT condition for include the asm/fsl_secure_boot.h. Signed-off-by: Po Liu <Po.Liu@freescale.com>
* Add GPL-2.0+ SPDX-License-Identifier to source filesWolfgang Denk2013-07-24-17/+1
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> [trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c] Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
* SECURE BOOT - Removed deletion of TLB entries codeRuchika Gupta2013-05-24-10/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Boot ROM code creates TLB entries for 3.5G space before entering the u-boot. Earlier we were deleting these entries after early initialization of CPU. In recent past, code has been added to invalidate all these entries before relocation of u-boot code. So this code to delete TLB entries after CPU initialization is no longer required. Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Acked-by: Matthew McClintock <msm@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
* powerpc/p4080: Add support for secure boot flowRuchika Gupta2011-10-03-0/+43
Pre u-boot Flow: 1. User loads the u-boot image in flash 2. PBL/Configuration word is used to create LAW for Flash at 0xc0000000 (Please note that ISBC expects all these addresses, images to be validated, entry point etc within 0 - 3.5G range) 3. ISBC validates the u-boot image, and passes control to u-boot at 0xcffffffc. Changes in u-boot: 1. Temporarily map CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE to the 1M CONFIG_SYS_PBI_FLASH_WINDOW in AS=1. (The CONFIG_SYS_PBI_FLASH_WINDOW is the address map for the flash created by PBL/configuration word within 0 - 3.5G memory range. The u-boot image at this address has been validated by ISBC code) 2. Remove TLB entries for 0 - 3.5G created by ISBC code 3. Remove the LAW entry for the CONFIG_SYS_PBI_FLASH_WINDOW created by PBL/configuration word after switch to AS = 1 Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Kuldip Giroh <kuldip.giroh@freescale.com> Acked-by: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
generated by cgit v1.1 at 2024-09-03 16:01:57 +0000