| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v7_maint_dcache_all() does not work reliable when build with gcc6,
see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318788
While debugging this I learned that v7_maint_dcache_all() is unreliable
when build with gcc5 too when it is marked as noinline.
This commit fixes the reliability issues by replacing the C-code with
the ready to use asm implementation from the kernel.
Given that this code when written as C-code clearly is quite fragile
(also see the existing comments about the C-code being the way it is
to get optimal assembly) and that we have a proven asm alternative,
I believe that this is the best solution.
Note that we actually already had a copy of the kernel's
v7_flush_dcache_all() before this commit in
arch/arm/mach-uniphier/arm32/lowlevel_init.S.
This commit moves that code arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cache_v7_asm.S, renames
it to __v7_flush_dcache_all(), and adds a v7_flush_dcache_all() wrapper
which saves / restores the clobbered registers for use from C-code.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eliminate the "ph1"_ prefixes from function names because "uniphier_"
describes the SoC familiy better.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current CONFIG names like "CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER_PH1_PRO4" is too
long. It would not hurt to drop "PH1_" because "UNIPHIER_" already
well specifies the SoC family. Also, rename files for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This function should just return for unknown SoCs rather than writing
unexpected values to registers.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
|
Before adding ARMv8 support, this commit refactors the directory
structure. Move ARMv7 specific files to arch/arm/mach-uniphier/arm32
to avoid a mess by mixture of ARMv7 and ARMv8 code. Also move the
"select CPU_V7" to the lower-level menu because we will have to
select ARM64 instead of CPU_V7 for ARMv8 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
