| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generalized misuse of ble within relocation and bss
initialization loops caused one iteration too many.
Instead of ble ('branch if lower or equal'), use
blo ('branch if lower').
While we're at it, fix all 'addreee' typos.
Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change the implementation for arm920 to relocate the code to
an arbitrary address in RAM.
Portions of this work were supported by funding from
the CE Linux Forum.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The driver name does not need to be writable, so constify it.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ARM ABI requires that the stack be aligned to 8 bytes as it is noted
in Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0042d/index.html
Unaligned SP also causes the problem with variable-length arrays
allocation when VLA address becomes less than stack pointer during
aligning of this address, so the next 'push' in the stack overwrites
first 4 bytes of VLA.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@mvista.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the following compiler problems:
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/liba320.a(timer.o): In function `udelay':
/home/wd/git/u-boot/work/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c:160: multiple definition of `udelay'
lib/libgeneric.a(time.o):/home/wd/git/u-boot/work/lib/time.c:34: first defined here
lib/libgeneric.a(time.o): In function `udelay':
time.c:(.text+0x1c): undefined reference to `__udelay'
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
|
