summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/cpu/arm1176
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeLines
* Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOTWolfgang Denk2010-10-29-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy(). With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
* Drop support for CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOCWolfgang Denk2010-10-29-214/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When this define was introduced, the idea was to provide a soft migration path for ARM boards to get adapted to the new relocation support. However, other recent changes led to a different implementation (ELF relocation), where this no longer works. By now CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC does not only not help any more, but it actually hurts because it obfuscates the actual code by sprinkling it with lots of dead and non-working debris. So let's make a clean cut and drop CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
* arm1176: fix relocationDarius Augulis2010-10-26-61/+97
| | | | | | | | | | Fix relocation code for arm1176, do it like other ARM CPU's are doing. Tested only with CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT defined and using nand_spl (booting from nand). Test done on s3c6410 based board (not yet supported in main line). Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
* Replace CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE by auto-generated valueWolfgang Denk2010-10-26-4/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE has always been just a bad workarond for not being able to use "sizeof(struct global_data)" in assembler files. Recent experience has shown that manual synchronization is not reliable enough. This patch renames CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE into GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE which gets automatically generated by the asm-offsets tool. In the result, all definitions of this value can be deleted from the board config files. We have to make sure that all files that reference such data include the new <asm-offsets.h> file. No other changes have been done yet, but it is obvious that similar changes / simplifications can be done for other, related macro definitions as well. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Acked-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
* Rename TEXT_BASE into CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASEWolfgang Denk2010-10-18-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | The change is currently needed to be able to remove the board configuration scripting from the top level Makefile and replace it by a simple, table driven script. Moving this configuration setting into the "CONFIG_*" name space is also desirable because it is needed if we ever should move forward to a Kconfig driven configuration system. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
* arm: bugfix: replace ble with blo in start.S filesAlbert Aribaud2010-10-11-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | Generalized misuse of ble within relocation and bss initialization loops caused one iteration too many. Instead of ble ('branch if lower or equal'), use blo ('branch if lower'). While we're at it, fix all 'addreee' typos. Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
* ARM: implement relocation for arm1176Heiko Schocher2010-09-19-1/+299
| | | | | | | | | | Change the implementation for arm1176 to relocate the code to an arbitrary address in RAM. Portions of this work were supported by funding from the CE Linux Forum. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
* ARM: Align stack to 8 bytesVitaly Kuzmichev2010-06-22-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The ARM ABI requires that the stack be aligned to 8 bytes as it is noted in Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0042d/index.html Unaligned SP also causes the problem with variable-length arrays allocation when VLA address becomes less than stack pointer during aligning of this address, so the next 'push' in the stack overwrites first 4 bytes of VLA. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@mvista.com>
* ARM1176: TI: TNETV107X soc initial supportCyril Chemparathy2010-06-08-0/+1286
| | | | | | | | | TNETV107X is a Texas Instruments SoC based on an ARM1176 core, and with a bunch on on-chip integrated peripherals. This is an initial commit with basic functionality, more commits with drivers, etc. to follow. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
* ARM1176: Coexist with other ARM1176 platformsCyril Chemparathy2010-06-08-21/+47
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current ARM1176 CPU specific code is too specific to the SMDK6400 architecture. The following changes were necessary prerequisites for the addition of other SoCs based on ARM1176. Existing board's (SMDK6400) configuration has been modified to keep behavior unchanged despite these changes. 1. Peripheral port remap configurability The earlier code had hardcoded remap values specific to s3c64xx in start.S. This change makes the peripheral port remap addresses and sizes configurable. 2. U-Boot code relocation support Most architectures allow u-boot code to run initially at a different address (possibly in NOR) and then get relocated to its final resting place in RAM. Added support for this capability in ARM1176 architecture. 3. Disable TCM if necessary If a ROM based bootloader happened to have initialized TCM, we disable it here to keep things sane. 4. Remove unnecessary SoC specific includes ARM1176 code does not really need this SoC specific include. The presence of this include prevents builds on other ARM1176 archs. 5. Modified virt-to-phys conversion during MMU disable The original MMU disable code masks out too many bits from the load address when it tries to figure out the physical address of the jump target label. Consequently, it ends up branching to the wrong address after disabling the MMU. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
* arm: Move cpu/$CPU to arch/arm/cpu/$CPUPeter Tyser2010-04-13-0/+1249
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>