diff options
author | Ćukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> | 2015-09-03 14:21:39 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> | 2015-09-11 17:15:21 -0400 |
commit | 0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe (patch) | |
tree | a0bcdc4c76b1415308f18028c26173a9b4f12738 /disk | |
parent | bcd62e72b2a0185f455ac5bac84416b59b294097 (diff) | |
download | u-boot-imx-0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe.zip u-boot-imx-0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe.tar.gz u-boot-imx-0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe.tar.bz2 |
FIX: fat: Provide correct return code from disk_{read|write} to upper layers
It is very common that FAT code is using following pattern:
if (disk_{read|write}() < 0)
return -1;
Up till now the above code was dead, since disk_{read|write) could only
return value >= 0.
As a result some errors from medium layer (i.e. eMMC/SD) were not caught.
The above behavior was caused by block_{read|write|erase} declared at
struct block_dev_desc (@part.h). It returns unsigned long, where 0
indicates error and > 0 indicates that medium operation was correct.
This patch as error regards 0 returned from block_{read|write|erase}
when nr_blocks is grater than zero. Read/Write operation with nr_blocks=0
should return 0 and hence is not considered as an error.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Test HW: Odroid XU3 - Exynos 5433
Diffstat (limited to 'disk')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions