diff options
| author | Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> | 2014-08-22 09:46:35 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> | 2014-09-09 16:26:33 +0200 |
| commit | dc73cbe7b05851a3ff76beabdc0589d2b3ebb9a3 (patch) | |
| tree | a5a1590d6c70073e0fda1af8c94c8f4d4b6f2750 /board/gateworks | |
| parent | 021e79c85371d2d5882f2eb6c58233f016add52d (diff) | |
| download | u-boot-imx-dc73cbe7b05851a3ff76beabdc0589d2b3ebb9a3.zip u-boot-imx-dc73cbe7b05851a3ff76beabdc0589d2b3ebb9a3.tar.gz u-boot-imx-dc73cbe7b05851a3ff76beabdc0589d2b3ebb9a3.tar.bz2 | |
imx: ventana: Avoid undefined behaviour
The leds array within struct ventana has space for 3 elements, but the
setup_board_gpio() function tries to set up 4 GPIOs for LEDs. Recent
versions of GCC complain about that:
board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c: In function 'setup_board_gpio':
board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c:987:27: warning: iteration 3u invokes undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
if (gpio_cfg[board].leds[i])
^
board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c:986:2: note: containing loop
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
^
Fix this by making the upper bound of the loop match the array size.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'board/gateworks')
| -rw-r--r-- | board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c b/board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c index 9a1b6dd..8d086f8 100644 --- a/board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c +++ b/board/gateworks/gw_ventana/gw_ventana.c @@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ static void setup_board_gpio(int board) #endif /* turn off (active-high) user LED's */ - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_cfg[board].leds); i++) { if (gpio_cfg[board].leds[i]) gpio_direction_output(gpio_cfg[board].leds[i], 1); } |